Skip to main content

Filppula v. State

Citations

  • 133 So. 3d 1232
  • 2014 WL 1016204
  • 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to consider the defendant's challenge to his illegal sentence on direct appeal because the defendant failed to preserve the challenge via motion under rule 3.800(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Khouzam, Larose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.