District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/14/2014
Filppula v. State
Citations
- 133 So. 3d 1232
- 2014 WL 1016204
- 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3510
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to consider the defendant's challenge to his illegal sentence on direct appeal because the defendant failed to preserve the challenge via motion under rule 3.800(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Khouzam, Larose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-05-29· cited 203×
- Quarterman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-07-14· cited 129×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-24· cited 116×
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-10· cited 16×
- Filppula v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-01· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.