Skip to main content

Fillingim v. Fillingim

Citations

  • 332 S.W.3d 361
  • 54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 436
  • 2011 Tex. LEXIS 66
  • 2011 WL 117664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to claim certain property as separate, party has burden to trace and clearly identify property as separate by clear and convincing evidence
  • explaining that residuary clauses typically divide property not explicitly mentioned in the decree
  • clarifying that trial courts can divide only community property
  • “A judgment finalizing a divorce and dividing marital property bars relitigation of the property division, even if the decree incorrectly characterizes or divides the property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

137 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Fillingim v. Fillingim

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.