Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/4/1973

Field v. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc.

Citations

451 Pa. 410
305 A.2d 689
12 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1037
1973 Pa. LEXIS 544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that parties’ failure to specify additional terms which “would enhance the[ir] position” will not prevent courts from finding that a contract was formed
noting that where a -5- J-A27025-18 contract does not specify a time for performance, performance must be completed within a reasonable time
rejecting a claim of unconscionability based on the principle stated in McKee
specific performance will not be granted unless the terms of the agreement are complete and certain
where factfinder determined that letter agreement was intended by the parties to be a valid, binding contract, Supreme Court will not reverse that finding
where factfinder determined that letter agreement was intended by the parties to be a valid, binding contract, Supreme Court will not reverse that finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brien, Eagen, Jones, Manderino, Nix, Pomeroy, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.