District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/7/1980
Fickle v. Adkins
Citations
- 385 So. 2d 1141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We are cognizant of the oft-stated proposition that the right to attorneys’ fees is derivative in nature ....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barkdull, Hubbart and Daniel S. Pearson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Daniel Mones, PA v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-03-20· cited 72×
- Litman v. FINE, JACOBSON, SCHWARTZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-22· cited 46×
- Fickle v. AdkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-10· cited 21×
- Zimmerman v. LivnatDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-03· cited 11×
- Gurman v. GurmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-09-10· cited 1×
- Saga Bay Gardens Condominium Ass'n v. For the Appointment of Blanket ReceiverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-27
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1925-12-16· cited 30×
- Hadlock v. HadlockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-02-14· cited 11×
- Wolf v. HortonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-02-06· cited 9×
- Hope v. LipkinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-10-15· cited 7×
- Simkins v. SimkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-04-27· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.