Skip to main content
· 3/20/1986

Daniel Mones, PA v. Smith

Citations

  • 486 So. 2d 559
  • 70 A.L.R. 4th 817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an “attorney must show: (1) an express or implied contract between attorney and client; (2) an express or implied understanding for payment of attorney’s fees out of the recovery; (3) either an avoidance of payment or a dispute as to the amount of fees; and (4
  • allowing common law retaining lien in money judgment obtained by attorney for client in a matter different than the matter for which the attorney sought security for fees
  • “In order to give timely notice of a charging lien an attorney should either file a notice of lien or otherwise pursue the lien in the original action.”
  • \Simply filing suit gave his former clients insufficient notice.\
  • common law retaining lien may apply to money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.