District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/8/2012
Ferrer v. State
Citations
- 113 So. 3d 860
- 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9211
- 2012 WL 2052775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plain smell doctrine did not apply where “officers were not in a location where they had a legal right to be when they detected the odor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altenbernd, Crenshaw, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 793×
- Nieminski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-29· cited 21×
- State v. TrianaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-19· cited 18×
- State v. PereiraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-26· cited 13×
- State v. NavarroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-22· cited 5×
- Fernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-15· cited 5×
- Soldo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.