Ninth Circuit· 5/23/1988
Fernandez v. Brock
Citations
- 840 F.2d 622
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deferring to the Secretary of Labor’s interpretation of statute that was ambiguous as to the presence of agency discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lambert v. AckerleyNinth Circuit· 1998-10-01· cited 240×
- La Asociacion De Trabaja-Dores De Lake Forest v. City of Lake ForestNinth Circuit· 2010-10-22· cited 167×
- United States v. Earl Thomas AndersonNinth Circuit· 1991-09-05· cited 131×
- Alexis Barrera-Echavarria v. Richard H. Rison, WardenNinth Circuit· 1995-01-12· cited 114×
- Thompson v. CalderonNinth Circuit· 1998-07-11· cited 114×
- Glanton Ex Rel. ALCOA Prescription Drug Plan v. AdvancePCS Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2006-10-16· cited 65×
- Sierra Club v. Department of TransportationHawaii Supreme Court· 2007-10-01· cited 63×
- Wilson v. CommissionerNinth Circuit· 2013-01-15· cited 54×
- Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. WilsonNinth Circuit· 1994-11-15· cited 48×
- Oregon Natural Resources Council v. LyngNinth Circuit· 1989-07-21· cited 45×
- United States v. Manuel Bobadilla-LopezNinth Circuit· 1992-01-09· cited 26×
- Alaska Wilderness League v. Sally JewellNinth Circuit· 2015-06-11· cited 26×
- Snake River Farmers' Ass'n v. Department of LaborNinth Circuit· 1993-11-09· cited 24×
- Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. Gavin NewsomNinth Circuit· 2019-03-21· cited 23×
- Sierra Club v. Hawaii Tourism AuthorityHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-12-06· cited 20×
- Alaska Center for the Environment v. BrownerNinth Circuit· 1994-03-30· cited 11×
- Look v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1997-05-21· cited 8×
- Sandra Jean Smith v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1991-12-24· cited 7×
- Sandra Jean Smith v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1991-05-01· cited 6×
- Lambert v. AckerlyNinth Circuit· 1998-10-01· cited 6×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 3,605×
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 1,991×
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 1,761×
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 1,057×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 843×
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23Supreme Court· 1987-12-14· cited 524×
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court· 1987-04-28· cited 499×
- Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-02-27· cited 407×
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationNinth Circuit· 1975-07-30· cited 320×
- Young v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court· 1986-06-17· cited 224×
- David H. Bruce v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1985-05-03· cited 103×
- Preston v. HecklerNinth Circuit· 1984-06-07· cited 63×
- Fernandez v. BrockNinth Circuit· 1988-05-23· cited 58×
- Greater Los Angeles Council on Deafness, Inc. v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of the Department of CommerceNinth Circuit· 1987-09-15· cited 39×
- C. Burglin v. Rogers C. B. Morton, as the Secretary of the Interior of the United StatesNinth Circuit· 1976-01-27· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.