Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 7/31/1991

Felton v. Unisource Corp.

Citations

  • 940 F.2d 503
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6176
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 9293
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17084
  • 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,905
  • 57 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 209
  • 1991 WL 138843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • citing, inter alia, 4 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58, 63 (1987)
  • citing, inter alia, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58, 63 (1987)
  • citing, inter alia, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58, 63 (1987)
  • employee's claim that he was discharged to avoid payment of medical benefits expressly preempted by ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1140
  • “The conclusion that an ERISA cause of action is most analogous to a statutory claim because ERISA is a statute reflects circular reasoning. Such reasoning sidesteps the Supreme Court’s requirement that we look to state law causes of action to determine the appropriate limitation period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferguson, Hug, Poole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Felton v. Unisource Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.