Carter's of New Bedford, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim for unfair competition fell within scope of “in connection with” clause
• rejecting public-policy argument against enforcement of forum selection clause in part because \[t]here is no suggestion in this case that the claim would not be honored\ in the selected forum
• dismissing, among other claims, a 93A claim pursuant to a valid forum selection clause where there was \no suggestion . . . that the claim would not be honored in [the other state]\
• “The burden of proof is on the party opposing the enforcement of the forum selection clause.”
• “[I]t is the language of the forum selection clause itself that determines which claims fall within its scope.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).