· 1/30/1980
Fee, Parker & Lloyd, PA v. Sullivan
Citations
- 379 So. 2d 412
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an appellate court is powerless to review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict if the appellant made no motion for a directed verdict
- existence or lack of probable cause is a pure question of law for the court to determine, with the resolution of disputed issues of fact a question to be submitted to the jury
- existence or lack of probable cause is a pure question of law for the court to determine, with the resolution of disputed issues of fact a question to be submitted to the jury
- appeal after final judgment and jury verdict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.