· 7/15/1975
Norton v. Hines
Citations
- 49 Cal. App. 3d 917
- 123 Cal. Rptr. 237
- 1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the plaintiff did not have cause of action against adverse party’s attorneys for simple negligence
- “‘[A]n adverse party is not an intended beneficiary of the adverse counsel’s client.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.