Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/29/2025
Feasby v. Garza
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5786
Syllabus
Civ.R. 60(B); Law of the Case; Timely Appeal. A Civ.R. 60(B) motion cannot be a substitute for a timely appeal and is not an alternative avenue to be used when all appeals have failed. Under the law-of-the-case doctrine, legal questions that are resolved by a reviewing court in a prior appeal are the law of the case governing any later proceedings in the trial court.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 2,230×
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- Ohio Pyro, Inc. v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-03· cited 197×
- State ex rel. Potain v. MathewsOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-03· cited 151×
- Glass v. DrydenOhio Supreme Court· 1969-05-28· cited 20×
- Lundeen v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court· 2022-05-25· cited 8×
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-25· cited 6×
- Carlson v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-06· cited 5×
- Wank v. WankOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-03· cited 4×
- Wedemeyer v. U.S.S. FDR (CV-42) Reunion Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-12-20· cited 3×
- United Bank v. LemonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-20· cited 3×
- Feasby v. GarzaOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-13· cited 1×
- Lane v. U.S. Bank N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.