Fassler v. Okemo Mountain, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Rlestrictions will not be extended by implication to include anything not clearly expressed, and doubts must be resolved in favor of the free use of land.” (quotation omitted)
• ‘When doubt arises as to the extent of restrictive covenants, the rule applied is that ‘restrictions will not be extended by implication to include anything not clearly expressed, and doubts must be resolved in favor of the free use of land.’ ”
• where meaning of deed unambiguous, extrinsic evidence of parties’ intentions unnecessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).