· 4/5/1966
Welch v. Barrows
Citations
- 218 A.2d 698
- 125 Vt. 500
- 1966 Vt. LEXIS 219
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that record showed grantor’s intent to benefit all purchasers of shore lots “by the inclusion of the covenants in the several subsequent deeds”
- “The intention of the parties, not the language used, is the dominating factor, and the circumstances existing at the time of the execution of the deed, the situation of the parties and the subject matter are to be considered.”
- “The intention of the parties, not the language used, is the dominating factor, and the circumstances existing at the time of the execution of the deed, the situation of the parties and the subject matter áre to be considered.”
- “The intention of the parties, not the language used, is the dominating factor, and the circumstances existing at the time of the execution of the deed, the situation of the parties and the subject matter are to be considered.”
- intention of the parties is dominating factor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holden, Shangraw, Barney, Smith, Keyser
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.