Skip to main content

Fasciana v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.

Citations

  • 829 A.2d 178
  • 2003 Del. Ch. LEXIS 68
  • 2003 WL 21538108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a series of Court of Chancery decisions declined to award fees- for-fees, citing justifications including the American Rule
  • holding corporation required to pay “fees for fees” in connection with actions to enforce 5 See Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v. Feldman, 2016 WL 183360, at (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2016
  • awarding fees-on-fees proportionate to the plaintiff’s success in prosecuting an advancement action
  • “When . . . the corporation wrongfully refuses to honor the official’s advancement request, and, as a result, the official needs to bring a § 145 claim to enforce his contractual right, then . . . reasonable fees on fees are in order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.