Sassano v. CIBC World Markets Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “ambiguity exists only ‘[w]hen the words of an agreement are . . . subject to different interpretations and when the words . . . otherwise create ambiguity when viewed in light of other contractual provisions[.]”
• concluding, post-trial, that a business unit that was an “unincorporated, non-legal entit[y] with no employees, no payroll, and no revenue of any sort” was an “enterprise”
• “[C]ourt[s] look[] to the most objective indicia of . . . intent: the words found in the written instrument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).