Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2/22/2000
Farrow v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 525 S.E.2d 11
- 31 Va. App. 517
- 2000 Va. App. LEXIS 113
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that truly inconsistent verdicts in a bench trial constitute reversible error
- finding that search during a temporary detention of suspect, while the officer escorted the suspect to the “security room” to obtain the officer’s “summons book,” did not constitute a search incident to a custodial arrest
- Officer \was authorized by Code § 19.2-74(A)(2) only to issue defendant a summons for a Class 3 misdemeanor.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- McGee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-07-08· cited 907×
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court· 1998-12-08· cited 800×
- Hayes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-05-11· cited 56×
- Lovelace v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1999-11-05· cited 36×
- Rhodes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-05-04· cited 21×
- Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-10-19· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.