Skip to main content
· 2/22/2000

Farrow v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 525 S.E.2d 11
  • 31 Va. App. 517
  • 2000 Va. App. LEXIS 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that truly inconsistent verdicts in a bench trial constitute reversible error
  • finding that search during a temporary detention of suspect, while the officer escorted the suspect to the “security room” to obtain the officer’s “summons book,” did not constitute a search incident to a custodial arrest
  • Officer \was authorized by Code § 19.2-74(A)(2) only to issue defendant a summons for a Class 3 misdemeanor.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.