Skip to main content

Farris v. State

Citations

  • 753 N.E.2d 641
  • 2001 Ind. LEXIS 774
  • 2001 WL 971919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that convictions for aiding in a “crime 7 of violence” were exempt from the consecutive sentencing limitation in Indiana Code section 35-50-1-2(c)
  • considering, under constitutional provision substan- tially similar to Article I, section 16, of the Oregon Constitution, whether the defendant’s aggregate sentence was proportionate to his “offense” of killing one person and wounding three others
  • treating the defendant’s challenge to the denial of his Trial Rule 50(A) motion for directed verdict as a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence because the defendant had presented evidence after the denial of his motion
  • “We will not reweigh the evidence or assess the credibility of witnesses. Rather, we look [only] to the evidence and reasonable inferences [from it] that support the verdict . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.