Farris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that evidence admissible under Evidence Rule 801(d)(1)(A) is admissible as substantive evidence
• no question that accomplice with familial relationship to defendant had motive to fabricate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bunch v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-21· cited 50×
• Robert Earl Badelle v. Curtis Correll
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-06-22· cited 49×
• Beauchamp v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-05-21· cited 37×
• Holsinger v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-06-29· cited 21×
• Jordan Pribie v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-04· cited 13×
• Lovitt v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-11-04· cited 8×
• Farris v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2009-06-16
• Kristine Bunch v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-21
• Badelle, Robert E. v. Correll, Curtis
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-06-22
• Elisha Smith v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-02-22
• Marcus A. Minor, Jr. v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2025-02-25

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• United States v. Bagley
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
• Kyles v. Whitley
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
• Conner v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-05-25· cited 123×
• Smart-Davis v. Johns Hopkins University
  Supreme Court· 2000-02-22· cited 97×
• Williams v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-07-23· cited 77×
• Azania v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-06-06· cited 29×
• State v. Winters
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-04-04· cited 20×
• Driver v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-06-24· cited 19×