Indiana Supreme Court· 3/13/1891
Farley v. State
Citations
- 127 Ind. 419
- 26 N.E. 898
- 1891 Ind. LEXIS 224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it is necessary upon request to advise the jury that the presumption of innocence prevails until the close of trial and that it is the jury’s duty to reconcile the evidence upon the theory of the defendant’s innocence if they can do so
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dustin E. McCowan v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 38×
- Rhodes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1891-05-12· cited 28×
- Robey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-10-24· cited 26×
- Ridge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1923-01-24· cited 19×
- Vaughan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1983-02-28· cited 17×
- Garvin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1970-11-10· cited 17×
- Shropshire v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-02-29· cited 10×
- Richard E. Simmons v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-12-20· cited 10×
- Simmons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1979-02-06· cited 9×
- Stephen Brakie v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-12-20· cited 8×
- Joseph Matheny v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-05-13· cited 7×
- Watson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1987-09-17· cited 3×
- Aaron Lee v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-13
- Myron Tools v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-09-30
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.