Stephen Brakie v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that child victim’s testimony was not inherently contradictory and that the incredible dubiosity rule did not apply
• finding that child victim’s testimony was not inherently contradictory and that the incredible dubiosity rule did not apply and affirming the defendant’s conviction for child molesting as a class A felony
• court does not reweigh evidence when the reasonable inferences permitted the trier of fact to determine guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).