Veterans Claims· 2/19/1993

Fanning v. Brown

Citations

4 Vet. App. 225
1993 WL 42289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the Board failed to provide adequate reasons and bases for its decision by not discussing the applicability of a total disability rating based on individual unemployability
recognizing that \[t]he [Board] properly raised the issue of pyramiding\ under § 4.14 when it denied separate ratings for a tender scar and the residuals of a right inguinal hernia, but remanding the case for an explanation of reasons or bases
remanding for Board to consider applicability of § 3.321(b)(1) where record contained evidence of numerous hospitalizations for service-connected disability and scant employment history
remanding for a “consideration of appellant’s employability in light of the pain he suffers”
Court remanded TDIU rating claim for BVA to provide reasons or bases where BVA had not given extraschedular consideration to the claim
Court remanded TDIU claim for BVA to provide reasons or bases where BVA had not given extra-sehedular consideration to the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kramer, Mankin, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.