Veterans Claims· 1/24/1992

Douglas v. Derwinski

Citations

2 Vet. App. 103
1992 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 28
1992 WL 13806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

remanding record, in part, due to BVA’s failure to address arguments advanced by appellant, including sworn testimony
even if Board considered all evidence and rejected it, Board was required to state precise basis for decision and respond to various arguments of appellant
the Court held that the Board in its decision making is required by § 7104(a) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.330(a), to consider all evidence of record
BVA improperly failed to address possibility that sailor’s skin cancer, first diagnosed years after discharge, was caused directly by his in-service exposure to sunlight as a deckhand in the Pacific Theater
remanded in part for the BVA to consider the issue of direct service connection for appellant’s carcinoma based on excessive exposure to the sun during his tenure as a deckhand in the Pacific Theater
same as to carcinoma manifest many years after separation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ivers, Nebeker, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.