Faggionato v. Lerner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting the conclusions of one of two dueling French law experts because it is the \ 'persuasive force of the opinions' expressed that is conclusive under Rule 44.1\
• court based its interpretation of French law on the expert declarations submitted by both parties and accepted those areas where the two experts did not appear to be in disagreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).