F. A. Smith Mfg. Co. v. Samson-United Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that remand is proper where there are factual determinations that need to be made to determine whether a participant is entitled to benefits
• recognizing that remand is proper where there are factual determinations that yet need to be made in order to determine whether a participant is entitled to benefits
• finding that the plan administrator acted arbitrarily and capriciously in failing to consider letters of attending physicians supporting the plaintiffs claim for disability benefits
• finding that the plan administrator acted arbitrarily and capriciously in failing to consider letters of attending physicians supporting the plaintiff's claim for disability benefits
• recognizing that remand is proper where there are factual determinations that No. 12-3834 Javery v. Lucent Tech., Inc. Long Term Disability Plan Page 18 need to be made to determine whether a participant is entitled to benefits
• remanding for retroactive reinstatement of benefits where plan administrator had opportunity to review all evidence and did so in a manner that was arbitrary and capricious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).