Kirsch Mfg. Co. v. Gould Mersereau Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rule 54(b) certification “is proper if it will aid ‘expeditious 7 decision’ of the case.’” (quoting Sheehan v. Atlanta Int’l Ins. Co., 812 F.2d 465, 468 (9th Cir. 1987)). A 8 judgment under Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).