Ezell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding out-of-court statements on an audiotape identifying the defendant as a drug dealer were inadmissible hearsay
• where the result of an appeal would have been different had appellate counsel not been deficient, the appropriate remedy is to grant a new trial
• omission of confidential informant's audio tape identifying defendant during a drug transaction, which if included would have allowed appellate court to find the audio tape should have been excluded as hearsay and order reversal of defendant's convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brewer
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-01-28· cited 16×
• Villados v. State.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-12-09· cited 5×
• Pantovich v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-08-07

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 56×
• State v. Dennis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-22· cited 46×
• Simpkins v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 26×
• Southerland v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-12-13· cited 24×