Exxon Corp., USA v. Dunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a plaintiff may recover damages “not only for physical injuries but also for annoyance, discomfort, and inconvenience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shaw v. Tampa Elec. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-05· cited 25×
• JORGE REYES v. JORGE COSCULLUELA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-10-27
• Sandra Shaw v. Ana Calles
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-05-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. Cadillac Motor Car Div.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-03-07· cited 52×
• Nitram Chemicals, Inc. v. Parker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-06-07· cited 13×
• Durrance v. Sanders
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-03-30· cited 12×
• Pearce & Pearce v. Kroh Bros. Dev. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-13· cited 12×
• Fort Lauderdale Transfer and Rigging, Inc. v. CALLAHAN MOTOR CO.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-21· cited 2×