Shaw v. Tampa Elec. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court may deny a request for injunctive relief in a summary judgment proceeding if it is clear the plaintiff cannot meet the requirements for an injunction
• “The moving party carries the heavy burden of showing conclusively that the nonmoving party cannot prevail.”
• \The general 'standard of review governing a trial court's ruling on a motion for summary judgment posing a pure question of law is de novo.' \ (quoting Major League Baseball v. Morsani, 790 So. 2d 1071, 1074 (Fla. 2001))
• “ A mandatory injunction is proper where a clear legal right has been violated, irreparable harm has been threatened, and there is a lack of an adequate remedy of law.’ ” (quoting Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Weinstein, 447 So.2d 345, 345 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).