Expedited Transportation Systems, Inc. v. Vieweg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when presumption is used to find successor liability and employer requests a hearing to rebut the presumption, the Division must grant such a hearing
• holding that when presumption is used to find successor liability and employer requests a hearing to rebut the presumption, the Division must grant such a hearing
• “[B]efore reaching the substantive issues raised, we must first contemplate whether the circuit court had jurisdiction to consider the appeal of this matter.”
• “[B]efore reaching the substantive issues raised, we must first contemplate whether the circuit court had jurisdiction^]”
• “It is the ‘duty of this Court to avoid whenever possible a construction of a statute which leads to absurd, inconsistent, unjust or unreasonable results.’” (quoting State v. Kerns, 183 W. Va. 130, 135, 394 S.E.2d 532, 537 (1990)
• “It is the 'duty of this Court to avoid whenever possible a construction of a statute which leads to absurd, inconsistent, unjust or unreasonable results.' ” (quoting State v. Kerns, 183 W.Va. 130, 135, 394 S.E.2d 532, 537 (1990)) (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).