Bowers v. Wurzburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that “the mere existence of a parent-subsidiary relationship, without a more definite showing of the parent’s control of the subsidiary” is insufficient to disregard the corporate form
• commenting that, “[generally, the allegations contained in a complaint are to consist of ‘a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,’ W. Va. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1
• commenting that, “[g]enerally, the allegations contained in a complaint are to consist of ‘a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,’ W. Va. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1
• declining to afford judicial decision broad retroactivity where, before its issuance, there existed “lack of clear authority in this State,” which resulted in “uncertainty of the law” as to issue decided (footnote omitted)
• “Typically, when two statutes govern a particular scenario, one being specific and one being general, the specific provision prevails.” (citations omitted)
• “Typically, when two statutes govern a particular scenario, one being specific and one being general, the specific provision prevails.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).