Skip to main content
· 4/22/1985

Exotic Coins, Inc. v. Beacom

Citations

  • 699 P.2d 930
  • 1985 Colo. LEXIS 424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • law that requires merchants to record and report purchases of valuable articles does not violate Fifth Amendment privilege under the required records doctrine
  • although the parties cited the Colorado Constitution’s search and seizure provision, the court declined to analyze a separate standard under the state provision when the parties raised no argument as to how the state provision differed from the federal one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lohr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.