Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/4/1987
Ex Parte Wilson
Citations
- 724 S.W.2d 72
- 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 515
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “an accused is entitled to effective assistance of counsel during the plea bargaining process”
- holding counsel must enable defendant to make informed plea-bargain decision but defendant is final authority on whether to accept or reject offer
- finding prejudice where applicant testified he would have accepted the plea bargain offer his counsel failed to communicate to him
- finding prejudice where applicant testified he would have accepted the plea bargain offer his counsel failed to communicate to him
- finding prejudice where applicant testified he would have accepted the plea bargain offer his counsel failed to communicate to him
- addressing defense counsel’s duties with respect to advising his client so that client can make an informed decision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Onion, McCormick, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
114 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ex Parte LemkeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-08· cited 1,138×
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-02-03· cited 695×
- United States v. William Day, A/K/A William McNeilThird Circuit· 1992-07-13· cited 398×
- Monreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-11· cited 206×
- Ex parte ArgentCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-03-20· cited 201×
- Ex Parte BattleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-16· cited 190×
- Ex Parte WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-27· cited 150×
- Ex Parte ReedyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-04-29· cited 83×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-27· cited 57×
- Martins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-07-26· cited 51×
- Aldrich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-08-25· cited 50×
- Randle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-01-20· cited 44×
- Garcia v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-12-23· cited 37×
- Maynard v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-05-26· cited 32×
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-07-26· cited 27×
- Paz v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-08-17· cited 26×
- Hernandez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-09-14· cited 25×
- Monreal v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1996-06-26· cited 24×
- Becton v. HunWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1999-05-18· cited 23×
- Ex Parte LafonTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1998-11-03· cited 23×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Thomas A. Johnson v. Jack R. Duckworth, Superintendent, and Indiana Attorney GeneralSeventh Circuit· 1986-06-19· cited 130×
- United States ex rel. Caruso v. ZelinskyThird Circuit· 1982-09-22· cited 103×
- Lyles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1978-11-28· cited 50×
- The PEOPLE v. WhitfieldIllinois Supreme Court· 1968-06-21· cited 43×
- Hanzelka v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1984-11-21· cited 38×
- Curl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-02-20· cited 12×
- Elmore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-02-18· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.