Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/24/1992
Ex Parte Williams
Citations
- 833 S.W.2d 150
- 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 155
- 1992 WL 139295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testimony regarding when and how defendant's IQ was measured and conflicting conclusions as to whether defendant was mentally retarded
- testimony regarding when and how defendant’s IQ was measured and conflicting conclusions as to whether defendant was mentally retarded
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maloney, McCormick, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. McPhersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-11-18· cited 39×
- Mines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-10-14· cited 39×
- Ex Parte TennardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-12-18· cited 33×
- Richard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-16· cited 24×
- In Re Toby Lynn Williams v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2024-01-23
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 359×
- Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-05-29· cited 196×
- Ex Parte GoodmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-07-03· cited 125×
- King v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-10-10· cited 96×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-21· cited 86×
- Ex Parte HarrisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-12-18· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.