Court of Appeals of Texas· 3/7/1996
Ex Parte Vasquez
Citations
- 918 S.W.2d 73
- 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 972
- 1996 WL 98180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- DUI prosecution following administrative license suspension for refusing to submit to breath test does not violate the protection against double jeopardy
- DUI prosecution following administrative license suspension for refusing to submit to breath, test does not violate the protection against double jeopardy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, Brigham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- Parrish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-26· cited 243×
- Neaves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-22· cited 63×
- Parrish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-02-15· cited 13×
- Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1996-01-11· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.