Skip to main content

Ex Parte Smith

Citations

  • 185 S.W.3d 887
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 187
  • 2006 WL 231628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that claim was not ripe for review and not cognizable in pretrial writ of habeas corpus because State had not had opportunity to develop complete factual record during trial
  • holding that claim is cognizable in pretrial writ of habeas corpus if, resolved in defendant’s favor, it would deprive trial court of power to proceed and result in defendant’s immediate release
  • holding that in pari materia claim was not cognizable on pre-trial writ of habeas where assault indictment was valid on its face and did not allege facts indicating that hazing was involved
  • concluding appellant’s in pari materia claim was not cognizable in pretrial writ because the claim was “not yet ripe for review”
  • concluding appellant’s in pari materia claim was not cognizable in pretrial writ because the claim was “not yet ripe for review”
  • concluding that aggravated assault is a result-oriented offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.