Azeez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that claim that defendant was punished more severely under Penal Code than “he could have been under the Transportation Code” is defect in judgment that may be presented for first time on appeal
• noting how defendant preserved “his in pari materia argument” by presenting argument to trial court in motion to quash, motion for directed verdict, and motion for new trial
• We have construed this provision [TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 15.22] to mean that, at least as a matter of state law, a restriction upon personal liberty that amounts to less than ‘full custodial arrest’ may nevertheless constitute an ‘arrest.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).