Skip to main content

Ex Parte Peterson

Citations

  • 466 So. 2d 984

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • wherein the Alabama Supreme Court held that the trial court's enhancement of the appellant's sentence by a prior conviction that was indisputably, on its face, not proper for use in enhancement was subject to review even though the appellant had not objected in the lower court
  • wherein our supreme court held that the trial court's enhancement of the appellant's sentence by a prior conviction that was undisputedly, on its face, not properly to be used for enhancement was subject to review even though the appellant had not objected in the lower court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Faulkner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.