Skip to main content

Ex Parte Payne

Citations

  • 741 So. 2d 398
  • 1999 WL 701671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the car seller could not enforce the arbitration provision contained in the purchase order because the condition precedent to the existence of a binding contract expressly set forth in the purchase order did not occur
  • stating that the dealer, Jay Pontiac, could not seek to enforce the arbitration provision found within the Retail Purchase Order and also claim that the Retail Purchase Order did not constitute a binding contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: See

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.