Ex Parte Morgan
Citations
- 114 U.S. 174
- 5 S. Ct. 825
- 29 L. Ed. 135
- 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1748
Syllabus
<p>A writ of mandamus may be used to require an inferior court to decide a mat- • ter within its jurisdiction, and pending before it for judicial determination, but nqt-to control the decision.</p> <p>The plaintiff -In the suit below, believing that the judgment as recorded did not conform to the finding, moved the court to amend it in that particular. The courtjheard and denied the motion: Held, That this was a judicial act which-could not be reviewed by mandamus.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- referring to the clerk’s “ministerial act of recording a judgment” as the “entry” of the judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 999×
- Commissioner v. Estate of BedfordSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 140×
- North American Butterfly Association v. Chad F. WolfD.C. Circuit· 2020-10-13· cited 115×
- Riddle v. DycheSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 110×
- In Re MorrisonSupreme Court· 1893-01-03· cited 49×
- ParkerSupreme Court· 1889-05-13· cited 47×
- Forstner Chain Corp. v. Marvel Jewelry Mfg. Co.First Circuit· 1949-11-10· cited 46×
- Kimberlin v. Commission to Five Civilized TribesEighth Circuit· 1900-10-15· cited 30×
- United States v. RayburnEighth Circuit· 1937-06-25· cited 17×
- Ex Parte BrownSupreme Court· 1886-01-18· cited 17×
- Silva v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court· 1937-04-05· cited 17×
- State ex rel. Colcord v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-01-15· cited 17×
- People ex rel. Wonogas v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court· 1924-04-14· cited 14×
- State ex rel. J. D. Matheson & Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-06-15· cited 13×
- Diaz-Reyes v. Fuentes-OrtizFirst Circuit· 2006-12-27· cited 10×
- Kay Ferer, Inc. v. HulenEighth Circuit· 1947-03-21· cited 10×
- United States ex rel. Harless v. Judges of United States Court of Appeals of Indian TerritoryEighth Circuit· 1898-01-10· cited 10×
- In Re HawkinsSupreme Court· 1893-02-06· cited 7×
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. MacfarlaneHawaii Supreme Court· 1902-11-15· cited 5×
- Deepwater Exploration Co. v. Andrew Weir InsuranceFifth Circuit· 1958-09-26· cited 4×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.