Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 4/6/1885

Ex Parte Morgan

Citations

  • 114 U.S. 174
  • 5 S. Ct. 825
  • 29 L. Ed. 135
  • 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1748

Syllabus

<p>A writ of mandamus may be used to require an inferior court to decide a mat- • ter within its jurisdiction, and pending before it for judicial determination, but nqt-to control the decision.</p> <p>The plaintiff -In the suit below, believing that the judgment as recorded did not conform to the finding, moved the court to amend it in that particular. The courtjheard and denied the motion: Held, That this was a judicial act which-could not be reviewed by mandamus.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • referring to the clerk’s “ministerial act of recording a judgment” as the “entry” of the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waite

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.