Ex Parte Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that injunction requiring party to maintain land \in a sightly condition\ was sufficiently specific to apprise party of actions required of him
• holding that injunction requiring party to maintain land “in a sightly condition” was sufficiently specific to apprise party of actions required of him
• there was only single act of contempt in failing to remove junk from premises pursuant to injunction and thus fine could not exceed $500 and could not be separately imposed for each day that condition of property remained unchanged
• there was only single act of contempt in failing to remove junk from premises pursuant to injunction and thus fine could not exceed $500 and could not be separately imposed for each day that condition of property remained unchanged
• person may not be confined for civil contempt longer than A the lesser of 18 months or the period from the date of confinement to the date the person complies with the court order that was the basis of the finding of contempt, if the confinement is for civil contempt @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re Long
  Texas Supreme Court· 1999-01-07· cited 268×
• Cadle Co. v. Lobingier
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-21· cited 178×
• In Re Patillo
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-11-09· cited 33×
• Ex Parte Durham
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1996-04-18· cited 21×
• In Re Cantu
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1998-02-19· cited 13×
• In re A.B.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-28· cited 11×
• Ex Parte Jones
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2000-12-21· cited 7×
• Ex Parte Gerdes
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-01-26· cited 6×
• Mitchell v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2018-09-24· cited 6×
• Cadle Co. v. Lobingier
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2000-10-05· cited 3×
• In Re AB
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1999-07-22
• Tom Kilpatrick and Janice Kilpatrick v. Curtis Tomlin and Patsy Tomlin
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-03-15
• Renee Louise Halay v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-12-31
• Lamb County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-12-31
• Unnamed case
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-12-31
• Unnamed case
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-12-31
• in Re: Charles T. Patillo
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-11-09
• Raul Cid v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-06-21
• in Re: Roger Gerdes, Jr.
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-01-26
• in Re John W. Cockrell
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2010-06-02

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Menna v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 1,036×
• Yates v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-25· cited 222×
• Ex Parte Ramzy
  Texas Supreme Court· 1968-01-31· cited 65×
• Ex Parte Dustman
  Texas Supreme Court· 1976-06-09· cited 64×
• Ex Parte Payne
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-15· cited 61×
• Huff v. Huff
  Texas Supreme Court· 1983-03-16· cited 51×
• Ex Parte Crawford
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-11-15· cited 31×
• Ex Parte Englutt
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-06-23· cited 10×