Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/30/2006
Ex Parte Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.
Citations
- 631 S.E.2d 86
- 369 S.C. 69
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the issue moot, yet reversing the closure order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1980-07-02· cited 1,951×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,326×
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 1,226×
- In Re the Knight Publishing Company D/B/A the Charlotte ObserverFourth Circuit· 1984-09-21· cited 447×
- United States v. SoussoudisFourth Circuit· 1986-12-11· cited 176×
- United States v. James O. BakkerFourth Circuit· 1989-06-27· cited 47×
- State v. LagerquistSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-07-30· cited 25×
- Ex Parte the Island PacketSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-04-27· cited 15×
- Ex Parte Columbia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-07-18· cited 11×
- Steinle v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-09-15· cited 9×
- State v. SheppardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-09-14· cited 3×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-05-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.