Skip to main content

Ex Parte Cruzata

Citations

  • 220 S.W.3d 518
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 427
  • 2007 WL 1135661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that trial court was correct that appellant did not need its permission to appeal after entering open plea of true to allegations in motion to adjudicate
  • noting that 5 “implicit in the holding [of Aguilera] was that a defendant begins to serve his sentence at the adjournment of court on the day that the sentence is assessed”
  • concluding that reassessed punishment increasing sentence was proper
  • stating that since habeas corpus is an extraordinary remedy available only when there is no other adequate remedy at law, it may not be used to assert claims that could have been asserted on direct appeal
  • “Habeas corpus is an extraordinary remedy and is available only when there is no other adequate remedy at law.”
  • \ H a beas corpus is an extraordinary remedy and is available only when there is no other adequate remedy at law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holcomb, Keller, Price, Womack, Johnson, Hervey, Cochran, Keasler, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.