Skip to main content

Ex Parte Cash

Citations

  • 178 S.W.3d 816
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1964
  • 2005 WL 3056860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant cannot satisfy the second prong of Strickland “based on pure conjecture and speculation”
  • holding that a defendant cannot satisfy the second prong of Strickland ―based on pure conjecture and speculation‖
  • holding that a defendant cannot satisfy the second prong of Strickland “based on pure conjecture and speculation”
  • holding that a defendant cannot satisfy the second prong of Strickland “based on pure conjecture and speculation”
  • holding that a defendant cannot satisfy the second prong of Strickland “based on pure conjecture and speculation”
  • concluding that habeas corpus applicant did not establish prejudice when finding that result of proceeding would have been different but for counsel’s errors “would be based on pure conjecture and speculation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey, Keller, Meyers, Keasler, Cochran, Holcomb, Price, Womack, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.