Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/16/2005
Ex Parte Cash
Citations
- 178 S.W.3d 816
- 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1964
- 2005 WL 3056860
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant cannot satisfy the second prong of Strickland “based on pure conjecture and speculation”
- holding that a defendant cannot satisfy the second prong of Strickland ―based on pure conjecture and speculation‖
- holding that a defendant cannot satisfy the second prong of Strickland “based on pure conjecture and speculation”
- holding that a defendant cannot satisfy the second prong of Strickland “based on pure conjecture and speculation”
- holding that a defendant cannot satisfy the second prong of Strickland “based on pure conjecture and speculation”
- concluding that habeas corpus applicant did not establish prejudice when finding that result of proceeding would have been different but for counsel’s errors “would be based on pure conjecture and speculation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hervey, Keller, Meyers, Keasler, Cochran, Holcomb, Price, Womack, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miller, Arthur Franklin Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-05-23· cited 144×
- Hollis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-02-16· cited 130×
- Rogers, Ex Parte Ronald DavidCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-06-27· cited 70×
- Branch v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2011-03-18· cited 64×
- Ramirez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-11-20· cited 61×
- Esaw Lampkin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-08-11· cited 60×
- Jimenez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-09-27· cited 53×
- Donald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2018-02-27· cited 40×
- Sifuentes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-03-22· cited 21×
- State v. BounhizaTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-08-21· cited 18×
- Thompson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-08-29· cited 17×
- Trestan Jemal Prescott v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-09-30
- Douglas Warren v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-03-02
- Courtney Benjamine Brissette v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-10-02
- Rosa Estella Jimenez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-08-31
- Billy Joe Hamilton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-08-31
- Jonathon Gene Benavides v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-04-05
- Sergeant Hollis AKA Sargent Hollis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-02-16
- Marsele Thompson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-08-29
- Joshay Richardson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-05-08
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,343×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 3,060×
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court· 2002-11-04· cited 2,207×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-14· cited 1,653×
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-15· cited 391×
- Mercado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-05-06· cited 276×
- Cartwright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-17· cited 53×
- Stein v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-11-06· cited 41×
- Uribe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-04-17· cited 30×
- Snow v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1985-08-15· cited 28×
- Ex Parte CoyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-11-15· cited 17×
- Ex Parte DietzmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-09· cited 16×
- Gonzales v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1984-05-30· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.