Skip to main content

Ex Parte Casey

Citations

  • 852 So. 2d 175
  • 2002 WL 254110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expressly adopting the Garland standard in the course of reversing the Court of Criminal Appeals' determination that a pardoned conviction could be considered for purposes of sentence enhancement
  • Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P., petitioner's claim, that he had received a full pardon on the six prior convictions used to enhance his sentence and that, therefore, the convictions were not valid for use as enhancement, was a jurisdictional issue regarding the legality of the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stuart, Woodall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.