Ex parte Casey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a plaintiff cannot sue for the breach of an alleged duty based solely on OCGA § 51-1-6
• noting that a plaintiff cannot sue for the breach of an alleged duty based solely on OCGA § 51-1-6
• rejecting argument that policy statement in federal banking statute set out sufficiently specific legal duty to support a state negligence claim under OCGA § 51-1-6 for misuse of confidential customer information
• rejecting argument that policy statement in federal banking statute set out sufficiently specific legal duty to support a state negligence claim under OCGA § 51-1-6 for misuse of confidential customer information
• “A duty in this case cannot rest solely upon [section] 51-1-6 be- cause this statute sets forth merely general principles of tort law.”
• negligence plaintiff must show “the alleged breach of a legal duty with some ascertainable standard of conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).