Everett v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an out-of-court statement “may be admissible to prove a variety of issues besides the truth of the matter, such as the declarant’s state of mind”
• noting that an out of court statement may be admissible to prove declarant’s state of mind

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• D.M.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-19· cited 8×
• Plummer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-28· cited 2×
• PLANTATION GENERAL HOSPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. DIVISION OF ADMIN. HEARINGS, BERNARD BELZI, etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-04· cited 1×
• DML v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-19
• Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Michael Jordan Lipp, etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-03-27
• Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Michael Jordan Lipp, Etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-10-29

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Foster v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-07· cited 63×
• Morris v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-03-06· cited 13×
• Lark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-28· cited 7×
• Fields v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-10· cited 6×
• Mayo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-04· cited 1×