Evans v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that District’s mental retardation and developmental delivery system was “broken” and needed to be “redefined and rebuilt”
• commenting that in the 2001 Plan, the parties agreed “on the yardsticks to be utilized in making determinations of compliance”
• waiving “all claims for past contumacious conduct of defendants as of the date of the entry of the [2001] Consent Order and approval of the Settlement Agreement”
• joint stipulated findings of fact adopted by the Court in connection with the 2001 Plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jane Does I Through III v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2002-12-16· cited 60×
• Harvey v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 2015-08-18· cited 22×
• Harvey v. Mohammed
  District of Columbia· 2012-01-27· cited 15×
• Evans v. Fenty
  District of Columbia· 2010-04-07· cited 13×
• Colbert Ex Rel. Colbert v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2015-01-12· cited 6×
• Colbert v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2013-12-13· cited 5×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Evans, Joy v. Williams, Anthony A.
  D.C. Circuit· 2000-03-31· cited 33×
• Evans v. Williams
  District of Columbia· 1999-02-10· cited 7×