Colbert Ex Rel. Colbert v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the named Plaintiffs [did] not have standing to 14 assert claims from states in which they [did] not reside or did not purchase their mobile 15 device”
• dismissing the plaintiff’s Rehabilitation Act claim where the plaintiff alleged that the defendant, a housing and residential service, failed to protect the plaintiff from becoming pregnant
• taking Judicial Notice of record of administrative agencies and publicly 8 accessible websites
• “[T]he fact that a party may be denied a quick victory is not 6 sufficient to deny relief from entry of default.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).